This interrupt-based digital I/O extended feature (DIO-EF) is not purely implemented in hardware, but rather firmware must service each edge. This makes it substantially slower than other DIO-EF that are purely hardware-based. To avoid missed edges, the aggregate limit for edges seen by all interrupt-based DIO-EF is 70k edges/second. If stream mode is active, the limit is reduced to 20k edges/second. Excessive processor loading (e.g. a busy Lua script) can also reduce these limits. Note that interrupt features must process all edges, rising & falling, even if a given feature is configured to only look at one or the other.
The more proper way to think of the edge limit, and understand error that could be introduced when using multiple interrupt-based DIO-EF, is to consider that the interrupt that processes an edge can take up to 14 μs to complete. When a particular channel sees an applicable edge, an IF (interrupt flag) is set for that channel that tells the processor it needs to run an ISR (interrupt service routine) for that channel. Once an ISR is started, it runs to completion and no other ISR can run until it is done (except that stream interrupts are higher priority and will preempt other interrupts). When an ISR completes, it clears the IF for that channel. So it is okay to have edges on multiple channels at the same time, as long as there is not another edge on any of those channels before enough time to process all the initial edges.
Say that channel A & B have an edge occur at the same time and an ISR starts to process the edge on channel A. If channel A has another edge during the first 14 μs, that edge will be lost. If channel B has another edge during the first 14 μs, the initial edge will be lost. If channel B has another edge during the second 14 μs (during the ISR for channel B), the new edge will be lost.
